new camp22

You are here: Stellar Forces > Campaign > new camp22

Sorry Steve why Marsec starts whith only 10 sectors?
Posted by henoh 2 years ago [Login to reply]

A random number of squares are removed. I'm not sure it confers any advantage or disadvantage, since there are less places to be attacked from.
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

since number of sectors is a victory condition it does
Posted by henoh 2 years ago [Login to reply]

we could easly get sec. 2.5 and 2.6
Posted by henoh 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Okay, that's done.
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Just lost sector 3,5. No play back. Not even remember taking 1st turn after deploying men ? Moonbase clash?
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Not sure to be honest. Do you have any spare units? @Petermock, did it say anything when you attacked?
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Had 8 or nine men well armed. Someone attacked narsec sector so had to defend before time ran out yesterday. Today I lost sector. No playback, no first go? Moon base clash? Sector 3,5?
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Pete has come up with the answer: It was game 51771. (I forgot that a sector's mission changes after each completed game in that sector).
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Fantastic campaign Steve. If only I could win more. My latest question is about getting stardrive to right side. My inventory and stardrive proximity scanner indicates I have no stardrive. Aliens Vs humans cyberhoards or something. Know I'll be blown to smithereens shortly but should stardrive be in inventory somewhere or to I have to get one man to otherwise? Regards
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Sorry one person to other side?
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

It's paradise valley human Vs human. Should I have a stardrive anyone or is it automatically with anyone who makes it to other side. Regards
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Hi Thrashbarg. This happened to me on that mission.
Steven had to edit it in.

I believe it should spawn in with your number 1 unit.
Posted by Ethereal Slayer 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I'd ditch the Paradise Valley mission altogether. If I remember rightly from my teens it had plants that attacked you. Rubbish mission that has nothing to do with the original.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I waited for the expansion pack, took two weeks to arrive in 1988. Rather disappointed with it. Loved the maze atttack with reinforcements coming in with basic rifles and sub-machine guns. I was 18 and a baby on the way.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

@Thrashbarg, I think I've fixed the problem with the Stardrive in the Paradise Valley missions now. It was trying to add the Stardrive when the particular game was created, but for campaign games, the units don't exist at first, until the player selects them. The Stardrives should all be given to a unit the next time a player finishes their turn.

@Xeno, no, I think I'll keep it.
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Steve what resemblance does it have to Paradise Valley. Someone that played it in the old days. None what so ever.

his a poor pathetic
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I think that should be poor pathetic attempt to imitate a Laser Squad Mission. I need to rein myself in. I will.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

There was pressure for an abortion. We resisted. My mum has been picked up from my daughter, she loves her granddaughter, after a knee operation. With Arthur in his child seat she had to get off her husband's car.

If she had gone through an abortion wouldn't be here today.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

We're working class. Just happen to have a BA and MA in my pocket.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Blown away, fuck it.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Bloody hell, pack it in.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Hi Xeno. Are you okay? You're not making much sense. Is everything okay?
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Thank you Steve. I have Bi-Polar and just going through something and embarrassing myself.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I will leave.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Cringe
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Not a problem, just hope you're okay and hope you have some support around you. Me and I'm sure plenty of others here are always ready to talk.
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Xeno, wishing all the best. I hope you get through what's happening, mate.
Posted by Socrates 2 years ago [Login to reply]

sorry for my english xeno i hope you are ok. I feel i know you for years even if we never talk to each others. take care mate.
Posted by henoh 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Hey Xeno, no worries mate...just take your time to get sorted, it will pass. You're in good company on here.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Hey Xeno. Hope things are looking better today bud!?
Posted by Ethereal Slayer 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Hey Xeno. Sending good vibes buddy, I'm sure everyone wishes you well, hope you stay.
Posted by RABID 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Hi Xeno, just to clarify, when I said "not a problem", I was talking about what you posted, not about that you said you were leaving. I hope you didn't mean leaving the game, and you'll stay around. :)
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Thanks everyone. Very kind of you. Much appreciated.

No Steve, not leaving, just meant the forum at that time. It was a bit ambiguous.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Happening again. Sterners revenge and rescue from the the mines I think. Just lost? No playback. No 1st go. Had sufficient troops deployed.
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Thrash are talking about Sterners Revenge in sector 3, 7 ? If so that was our Break Out mission. The mission changes each time after each one is finished.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Our game number was 51923. Should be both in All finished and My finished Games.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Thanks was looking for sterner revenge.didn't know it changed. Will look for 6.6. that was probably changed too.
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Thanks Peter.
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Yep the idea of the mission changing is so we don't get stuck playing the same mission over and over in the same sector. Keeps the map fresh and challenging. I think this is what's confusing you Thrash. If it's something else I apologise. The map is pretty chaotic, I get lost in it.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

You could randomise the missions like what seems to happen with Omni corp games. Or I know your busy now with campaign (is there a finishing dare?) Put the escape hatch on the opposite side be more interesting having to get past annoyed opposition
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

It's not just Omni Corp games that get randomised.

But that's a good suggestionmabout putting the escape hatch on the opposite side.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

The finishing date is the end of May as I recall.

Sorry, which mission are we talking about?
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I've added that change to the H&R missions so the escape hatches are on the opposite side. It may not stop campers, but we'll see.

http://www.stellarforces.com/dsr/forums/ForumPostingsPage.cls?topic=30957
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I did think we had agreed previously to shutting entry to the campaign once it had officially started, otherwise you get players coming in and out willy nilly, disrupting the flow of the tournament once it is well underway.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Hey Xeno.
Gatekeeper is not a good look dude.
I fondly recall you being the first person to invite me to games on here.
Might I suggest you message igoryan and set up some practice / coaching games with them. Maybe have some Omni Corp training games. You're one of the best players on here. You'd be a great teacher / guide. Look how quickly I improved thanks to our early matches.
Posted by Ethereal Slayer 2 years ago [Login to reply]

That being said. This is my first campaign. I can see it being annoying if players sign up and then don't commit to the missions.
Posted by Ethereal Slayer 2 years ago [Login to reply]

We have had this before, people join up late and disappear. It means Peter and I have a third of our units rather than half. Igoryan I believe has done this before.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Was it Igoryan that was suspected of cheating? I've tried the search but comes up with games rather than posts. I could be out on a limb here but my memory isn't often wrong.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Not sure what you mean by "gatekeeper being not a good look dude"? If you mean who can access the campaign that is up to the real gatekeeper, Steve. If he says anyone can join the campaign at any time, I go with it. But I got this flipping thing started after it stagnated for three years, and I think my view is worth something dude.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Might I suggest you message igoryan and set up some practice / coaching games with them. Maybe have some Omni Corp training games. You're one of the best players on here. You'd be a great teacher / guide. Look how quickly I improved thanks to our early matches.

Are you for real? You sound American? Just read that back. Don't patronise me.

I'm not here to coach or train. I'm here to kick-ass.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Okay, let's not forget this is only a game and we're all only here to enjoy ourselves. And let's not take things the wrong way and keep it friendly.

I'll open it to a vote on whether to close the campaign to new players; either vote here or send me a message to keep it anonymous. I don't feel too strongly either way, but my vote is to keep it open.
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

My vote is once it has begun it is closed like any other tournament. But you did start it abruptly Steve. You could have left it a few days more and announced a starting time.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I'm all about keeping it real thanks.
As it happens my wife is half American.
You have beef with Americans now?

I did not mean to be patronising. Sorry if it came across that way.
I just feel it would be beneficial to this game (and we'd have more players for campaigns) if we try to propagate a more inviting environment for non-seasoned players...

After all, everyones view is worth something!
Posted by Ethereal Slayer 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I wish I could have 12 battles on the go at the same time!
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I like America. I used to be called Hank by some at college (before Uni) because I stood up for them so much.

Just drop the dude and the patronising tone, I'm not a teenager. I'm a grandfather so maybe pops ;)
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I'm all for more players. I have tried to get a campaign running twice before. But not enough people interested. Now I thought we had so I tried to get one going once again. Bingo.

Steve shot the gun too early. We should have waited to see who else to join. I even said about Captain Fismonger early on. But for me once it starts then we go with our teams. No jonny come lately.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

This will definitely be my last. It used to be 7 days before a turn until Peter and I kicked up a fuss and 'moaned'. Peter said this wasn't Chess by mail. :) I've been a moaner but a constructive one who has got about changes over the years probably more than any other. Been a pain in the backside to Steve.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Xenos point about not letting new players in halfway through the campaign is valid. It messes up with tactics, troop allocation. And they're not actually new players, they're late players. What we need next time is joining period, maybe 7 days then the factions are sealed, everyone is in agreement or has a chance to bring to notice any unfair issues. When the enlisting period is up, game on no Johnny come latelys.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I like that expression, been years since I've heard it :)
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Also the announcement that we were starting a new campaign was up for plenty of time for people to join. Anyone frozen out will have to join the next campaign or only joins if someone drops out or if everyone is in absolute total agreement which faction a new player is put.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

The chess my mail? I loved that.

Or the Johnny come lately? Perfect phrase.

But we've be campaigning (pun unintended) for years to get this bloody fixed. Thought we had put this issue to bed last campaign! Although it's been 3 years so we have all forgotten, dozed off. Now it raises it's head again.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Even better Chess by mail!
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

hello everyone!! I'm glad to see everyone and continue to play this cool game!! who remembers me, I used to be here often and now I decided to remember the past. all cool games!! Let's enjoy what Steve did!
Posted by igoryan 2 years ago [Login to reply]

if there is some kind of conflict that I joined a team where they are not happy to see me, I am ready to play for another team, no problem. Steve transfer me to any team, for me the main thing is the game and enjoying the process
Posted by igoryan 2 years ago [Login to reply]

It's nothing personal from me but if you're happy to be another faction, that would be cool.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

no problem friends. Steve move me to another faction of your choice to keep the game balanced
Posted by igoryan 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Hi Igoryan, and welcome back!

@Slayer and @Socrates, is it okay if I move Igoryan to your faction, since you only have 2 players?
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

It's a yes from me. A third would be great.
Posted by Ethereal Slayer 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Thanks Slayer, that's done.
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

thanks Steve!
Posted by igoryan 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Definitely a yes! Welcome aboard!
Posted by Socrates 2 years ago [Login to reply]

How about more incentive next campaign. In the navy they gave you a gold sovereign. You could offer a sterner brucey bonus platinum sovereign 20 points for anyone who fights in the campaign.

Also thanks Socrates kindly letting ambassador meander across open ground luckily without even needing a plaster.
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Socrates (Metallix) has defeated igoryan (Metallix) and successfully defended sector 4-3.

*Scratches head completely confused*
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Metallix fighting itself now...Civil War has broken out. :)
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

:D
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Did he start a game while he was in your faction?
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Yes I reckon that's the case. I definitely remember seeing his games started. But who will win...Metallix that's who :)))
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Ohh God! I just went to battle in auto mode, and not even remembering he is in our faction and same side. But hey.. how did the game permits that? I know I didn't do it on purpose.. was he in another faction previously?
Posted by Socrates 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Yes! I think it's ok to play the game out to the end as your Faction can't lose. Unless Steve wants to step in but I think it's ok :)
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I'm happy with it if everyone else is. The game has already finished, and since it will stayed as Metallix, I can't see a problem. Hopefully no high-ranking units were lost...
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I'm fine with it after watching the playback. They earned it. :)
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Just a heads up to players that aren't force cancelling on 3 days waiting. Quite a few players are doing this now, I've been doing it also last few days. I've noticed a few players aren't force cancelling, like Henoh. So in the interest of fairness I thought everyone needs to know about this, so hit the force cancel as soon as you see 3 days.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Sorry its a bit confusing what I just wrote.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Its not meant as a criticism about those that are force cancelling. I mean some players need to start force cancelling. And I also meant, I've recently started doing it as well. Anyone that isn't, should do it as well to be as competitive as possible.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

If feels mean to cancel a game but press that button : )
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

*If = It feels
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I don't like to do so either Pete, as competitive as I am in this game, I believe in sportsmanship. But it is the rule which we all agreed to. It used to be 7 days before a turn which I complained about years ago. You agreed saying it's not flipping postage chess. I mentioned that before but I love that. And we all agreed.

Sometimes I've forgotten or been too busy, or I haven't got enough units. It's nothing personal. I've even given players extra hours to deploy.

Btw, this might sound like a planned forum post but I didn't know Pete was posting this. We discussed it previously though.

Omni Corp: We kick arse while caring.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

We meet you out on the Stellar Force battlefield. Remember deploy your troops, or else.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

To avoid any unfairness, I could change it so that if a player doesn't take a turn within 3 days, it gets automatically force cancelled?
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I think that would make sense Steve. Just like if an attack isn't defended on the galaxy map.
Posted by Ethereal Slayer 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Yep I reckon that sounds fair.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Agree with this, I always feel bad force cancelling, but then if I don't it means I can't defend as I don't have enough units because they are tied up in games that are not getting played.... so yeah, automatic cancel after 3 days, seems the fairest way.....
Posted by RABID 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Just to muddy the waters even more :)..... this might be because we removed all the blank spaces, but I'm noticing that once a faction gets 22/23+ spaces, they start running out of resources to defend them all, so for weeks now we've all been dancing around the same sorts of numbers,
it kind of reaches a balance, it feels like it used to be easier to gain a lead and maintain it.
Posted by RABID 2 years ago [Login to reply]

That's a good point, I'm surprised it hasn't been noticed before. Given that each player in a faction is limited to 40-50 players, it stands to reason that the more sectors they have, the thinner the army is spread.

I guess the obvious solution is for me to increase the maximum number of units, or maybe base it on the total sectors that a faction owns?
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

BTW Igoryan, all your emails are bouncing back as it thinks they're spam.
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I'm happy for extra troops but not related to sector numbers gained. Just everyone having a higher amount than present.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I genuinely thought the same number of limited troops to defend an increased area of control is a really nice balancing mechanism.
Certainly the blank spaces would create choke-points.
Also trying to control a solid block, or maintain a front line to achieve 'safe' sectors would be the tactical dream.
Alas. War is chaos ha ha
Posted by Ethereal Slayer 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I liked the blank spaces when we first had them but in the end they slowed the game down for some factions.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Extra number of recruits per sector held. Not sure what the number should be. But it does make sense. Otherwise like Rabid has said, you gain more but you have less manpower to protect it. Recruit native troops to hold your gains.

"you're a better man than I am Gunga Din"
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

This sounds good in theory.
But I fear would become unbalanced quickly.

It could work if there was a diplomatic element allowing the factions with less sectors (and therefore less troops to stage counter-attacks) to team up against the dominating faction.

Otherwise it'll be like Risk.
And Risk is a boring board game for everyone except the winner.
Posted by Ethereal Slayer 2 years ago [Login to reply]

It wouldn't work like Risk and doesn't, as you can only deploy a finite amount of units per sector.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Yeah like us dunces never thought of that until you came. Binggg another asking for diplomatic element Mr Smith, just walked in, okay in the bin.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Number of reinforcements based on territories held = my comparison to Risk.
Winners get more, losers get less. Right?
Compare it to Monopoly if you prefer...
Both are poor models for engaging multiplayer games.

Unless there is a balancing mechanism to give the smaller factions some hope.
A 'diplomatic element' was simply a suggestion.
Or the smallest faction could have special 'resistance strike teams'.
Etc etc

Personally, I believe limited units, as frustrating as it can be, is both simple and realistic.
I'm sure every commander in history has grappled with the logistical challenge of what troops to send where. And which fights to pick.
Posted by Ethereal Slayer 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Blue Peter badge for automatic cancellation after 3 days. 3 day ban on attacking other sectors to let other players cancel to would be good. I wouldn't mock that idea. I know certain people would be 16 days without attacking. Wondering how people have 12 battles on the go at the same time or currently 9 attacking another 5 sectors. It's bit annoying knowing your troops are going to be tied up whilst people don"t deploy for 3 days. Also all individuals should have same number of troops for fairness. Just an observation on my old Amiga when you pressed automatic 3 shots would be fired not one and doors could be destroyed by guns or ordinance. Thanks for all your hard work anyway steve
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

The about the winning faction being over stretched troop wise isn't actually a problem. You don't need extra troops because everyone has overlooked the winning advantages of extra sectors. The more sectors won in a group means you have a front line. All sectors behind are out of reach of attack and don't need defending. Hence less troops to defend a larger area. You only need to defend the front line.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

This particular Campaign, the map is very fractured and spread out. Past games we fought more in blocks of territory with occasional break throughs. Strategy, name of the game. If you instead have a large territory that's spread out, it's going to be harder to defend as you'll be attack from all sides. Solution is to make a block with safety sectors in your starting corner.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

If extra troops are added, everyone gets them, that's fine with me but giving extra troops for having more territory is a bad idea.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Excuse missing words. 'The *thing about the winning faction
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

And 'All sectors behind (front lines) are out of reach of *being attacked...
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Remember the winning conditions are not only having the most sectors. The faction holding the most corner sectors wins over numbers of sectors. The map at the moment looks like everyone has forgotten the Campaign strategies and people are just attacking what's available at random.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Winning conditions are, if a faction holds all 4 corner sectors they instantly win, even before the Campaign end date. And if that doesn't happen then it falls to the faction with the most sectors on the end date.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Ah I didn?t know that, I thought the corner thing had been scrapped in favour of number of sectors
Posted by RABID 2 years ago [Login to reply]

That's a good point Peter about blocks strategy meaning you don't need as many units. And I did the same as Rabid think we had changed the corner victory condition to overall sectors.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Steve, have a game that my opponent hasn't deployed in and it says 3 days yet hasn't automatically force cancelled and it won't allow me to do so.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I don't remember the corner strategy/win condition being scrapped. I've always liked corners and number of sectors as a decider if corners aren't achieved. Having both win conditions I always thought made the Campaign more interesting. Hmm... Guys we need to make a decision. My vote would be all 4 corners still trumps number of sectors, highest sectors wins if corners aren't held.
Posted by petermock 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Regarding 4 corners, I don't mind either way, so lets have a vote. I vote in favour of it. FWIW, I don't remember it being scrapped, but equally I forgot it existed anyway. I've searched the forums for the word "corner" and nothing came up about it being scrapped.

Strangely enough, there is a "hidden" bit of text on the galaxy map page which says about the 4 corners rule, but you can only see it if you view the page source of the website. No idea why I chose to hide it and not just remove it; maybe it was an accident that it was hidden?
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

@Xeno, which game is it? I can't see any obvious one. Also, do you want to start a new thread for that question, to save emailing everyone else.
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

So my current games says battle for sigma five waiting for both players to take turn but when I goto take turn it does not say anything. I remember deploying though. Also name might have been changed on campaign board i seem to remember but might not be
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

It's sector 7,7. Normally it says one person's go or the other. Not both. Almost day 2 now. Can it be unblocked otherwise I'll lose my chance of battle by default
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Steve, it is okay now, my opponent deployed later today, but it did not force cancel after it turned 3 days when I was last on at 1 am earlier.

@Thrasbarg that is what I had last night, 3 days yet no force cancel and it said waiting for both to deploy, yet I had already deployed the day before!
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

And I'm fine with the 4 corner victory condition. In fact I'm starting to get a bit tired of the campaign already, and it shows with silly schoolboy mistakes I'm making. But even without the corners, only two weeks to go as we made it end of May, correct? Two months is more than enough, and to think we used to play for three or even four months previously, in fact I think it was 5 months once?!
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I've added a bit of text to the top of the Galaxy Map page to confirm that if any faction gets all four corners they will win. I don't think it's going to make much difference since each corner is owned by a different faction, and I think it's a good objective to aim for.

@Thrash, that should be fixed now. Apologies, I added a feature where it would now say "both" if waiting for both players, but there was a small issue.
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

There's quite a few games that are on the 3-day cancel limit. I've not turned on the "auto-force cancel" feature, but since there is only 9 days of the campaign left, I'll be turning it on later today to speed things up. Please take your late turns as soon as you can!
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

That escape is a bit dodgy. I escaped 2 xeno escaped none. He killed one more of my men so won?
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

I did expect a draw myself as neither of us had escaped all of our units before the turns had expired.
Posted by xeno 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Hi Thrash, I've started a new thread for this to avoid spamming everyone else: http://www.stellarforces.com/dsr/forums/ForumPostingsPage.cls?topic=31221#pid24203
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Thanks for all the good games. Well played to the winners. Thanks to Steve for your hard work.
Posted by thrashbarg 2 years ago [Login to reply]

Thanks Thrash, it's been a pleasure. Probably the best campaign we've had.
Posted by SteveSmith 2 years ago [Login to reply]

This topic has now been closed.

Stellar Forces Web Server 1.94 For help & support, please visit the forums or email support

new camp22

Register using the Android or PC app